'I don't agree': Starmer responds to Strategic Defence Review chief after he slammed 'corrosive complacency'

Treasury officials have been accused of “vandalism” for not allowing enough funds for defence reforms

Sir Keir Starmer said he disagrees with Lord George Robertson after the former Nato chief accused the Government of “corrosive complacency” on defence spending.

Lord Robertson of Port Ellen claimed the UK is underprepared for war and ministers are unwilling to make the necessary investment. The former Labour defence secretary warned “we cannot defend Britain with an ever-expanding welfare budget” in a speech on Tuesday.

Responding to the criticism at Prime Minister’s Questions, Sir Keir said: “Let me start by saying I respect Lord Robertson and I thank him again for carrying out the strategic (defence) review. My responsibility is to keep the British people safe, and that is a duty I take seriously. That is why I don’t agree with his comments.

Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer has responded to claims made by Lord Robertson about the government being beset by 'corrosive complacency' on defence reforms.placeholder image
Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer has responded to claims made by Lord Robertson about the government being beset by 'corrosive complacency' on defence reforms. | Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

“Last February, that was seven months after taking office, I took the decision to increase defence spending from 2.3 per cent to 2.6 per cent, paid for by my difficult decision on overseas aid. Last June, at the Nato summit, I committed to raising core defence spending to 3.5 per cent. Last November, the budget committed record funding to defence. I reaffirm those commitments now. The strategic defence review, is a 10-year blueprint for national security. The defence investment plan will put that into effect. It will be published as soon as possible.”

Lord Robertson had told the Financial Times there was a gap between the prime minister’s rhetoric on defence and the action he had delivered, saying Sir Keir was “not willing to make the necessary investment”. During her clash with the prime minister, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch pressed him on when the defence investment plan (Dip) will be published, calling for it to come before the end of the parliamentary session.

Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, who co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review (SDR).placeholder image
Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, who co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review (SDR). | Local Library

She said: “Lord Robertson’s criticisms were of the prime minister, and he says Britain’s national security is in peril. Our armed forces are at the end of their tether waiting for this Government to fund the strategic defence review (SDR). There are still two weeks of the parliamentary session left so why won’t the Prime Minister publish the defence investment plan before then?”

Sir Keir did not respond to this directly, instead saying the government is “spending £270bn over this Parliament, that’s £5bn more this year, with defence funding increasing every year”. The 10-year plan was due to be published in autumn last year to deliver the SDR’s plans.

Mrs Badenoch continued: “It is being reported that the Treasury is asking the MoD (Ministry of Defence) to make £3.5bn worth of cuts this year. He won’t fund our military because he wants to fund more welfare. That’s why he has a welfare plan to 2031, but no defence investment plan at all. Now the Chagos surrender deal is dead. Will the Prime Minister put the billions saved from ditching Chagos into defence, or is that going into welfare as well?”

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch at Prime Minister's Questionsplaceholder image
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch at Prime Minister's Questions | House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire

Sir Keir replied: “We are spending more on defence, record amounts on defence.” He added: “We got the biggest boost of defence spending since the Cold War. We’ve also got the biggest pay rise for our armed forces for over 20 years. We’ve also got the biggest investment in military housing for over half a century.”

Sir Keir’s defence team later faced criticism from Labour backbenchers, including the Commons Defence Committee chairman Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi. The Slough MP described Lord Robertson’s intervention as “sobering”, and warned delays to the Dip risked causing “further damage” to the defence industrial base.

“His comments align with what the Defence Committee has been highlighting for several months now, that we are ill prepared to face the threats that we as a nation currently are facing in a more volatile world,” Mr Dhesi said.

Emma Lewell, Labour MP for South Shields, said bolstering defence investment “should not come at the expense of those pensioners and people with disabilities receiving welfare”. She said: “There are obvious other ways – scrap digital ID, look at some of our net-zero policies, rethink some of the fiscal rules.”

Minister for defence industry and readiness, Luke Pollard, told Commons “not a day goes by” without a new defence contract being signed. He pointed to the £879m contract being signed to maintain Apache and Chinook helicopters, securing hundreds of jobs in Gosport.

News you can trust since 1877
Follow us
© 2026 Iconic Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice